Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Maynard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendant insurance company, in this Court, interposed demurrer ore tenus for that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against it in that the alleged promise by its agent, if made, was without consideration and is therefore unenforceable. The demurrer is well advised and must be sustained. Stonestreet v. Oil Co., 226 N.C. 261, 31 S.E. 2d 676.

So far as this record discloses, the insurance company was under no contractual duty to plaintiff to provide hospital and medical care for her. The assurance of its claim adjuster or employee that the company would pay the expenses of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Luttrell v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Shaw v. . BarnardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Fincher v. RhyneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Taylor v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Batts v. FaggartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API