Legal Opinion
In Re Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 26, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
140 N.J. Super. 500 (1976)
357 A.2d 1
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY OF THOMAS K.J. TUSO UNDER N.J.S.A. 2A: 81-17.3.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 2, 1976.
Decided March 26, 1976.
Before Judges KOLOVSKY, BISCHOFF and BOTTER.
Mr. Marvin D. Perskie argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Perskie and Callinan, attorneys).
Mr. Mark J. Malone, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BISCHOFF, J.A.D.
A state grand jury, sitting in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Petition to Compel Testimony of TusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977