Legal Opinion

In Re Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 30, 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

73 N.J. 575 (1977)

376 A.2d 895

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY OF THOMAS K.J. TUSO, UNDER N.J.S.A. 2A:81-17.3.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 7, 1977.

Decided June 30, 1977.

Mr. Robert J. Del Tufo, First Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Mark J. Malone, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey (Mr. Hyland, attorney).

Mr. Marvin D. Perskie argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Perskie and Callinan, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, P.J.A.D., Temporarily Assigned.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Hughes; Dissent; Concurrence · Hughes.

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DolinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  3. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. State v. IrizarryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. State v. SummersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API