State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
The single issue presented in this criminal appeal is whether the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to suppress testimony by a polygraph examiner concerning incriminating admissions made to the examiner by defendant during a pretest interview prior to a polygraph examination. Due to circumstances, however, the examination was never completed.
Defendant appeals assigning as error the overruling of his motion to suppress the testimony of the polygraph examiner.
The essential facts are as follows: Defendant and two others were indicted for the crimes of robbery, kidnapping and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. SuttlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. DeminskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979