Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1977No. C 76-03-03725, CA 7013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The single issue presented in this criminal appeal is whether the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to suppress testimony by a polygraph examiner concerning incriminating admissions made to the examiner by defendant during a pretest interview prior to a polygraph examination. Due to circumstances, however, the examination was never completed.

Defendant appeals assigning as error the overruling of his motion to suppress the testimony of the polygraph examiner.

The essential facts are as follows: Defendant and two others were indicted for the crimes of robbery, kidnapping and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. SuttlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. State v. DeminskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API