Legal Opinion
E. E. Atkinson Co. v. Neisner Brothers, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 4, 1935No. 30,048PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 258 N.W. 151, 259 N.W. 185. Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
The action is a consolidated suit to recover rents of a business property in Minneapolis leased by plaintiff to defendant, by a written lease entered into November 16, 1927, covering a term from February 1, 1928, to February 28, 1940, at an annual rental of $60,000, payable in monthly payments of $5,000 in advance on the first day of each month. There were nine separate suits brought to recover such monthly rentals. They were consolidated into one action and so tried to the court.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Pennington v. RobergeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Pohl v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Lynch v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Widmer Et Ux. v. LeffelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Kelsey v. NagyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. City of St. PeterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Petsche v. EMC Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- American Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Otis Hann Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963