Legal Opinion
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. City of St. Peter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 27, 1988No. C5-88-1422PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (SMMPA) brought a declaratory judgment action against the City of St. Peter (St. Peter) to determine whether its April 11,1984, electric power sales contract (contract) was enforceable. St. Peter counterclaimed, seeking to have the contract rescinded on equitable grounds. Concerned Citizens for Reasonable Electric Rates, Inc. (CCRER) intervened (on the side of St. Peter) as a defendant, representing consumers of St. Peter’s municipal electricity. The trial court declared the contract to be valid and dismissed all counterclaims.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. PerranoskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ransom v. VFS, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Bloom v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- H Enterprises International, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Swenson v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- UNION COUNTY, IA v. Piper Jaffray & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.