Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Peck

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1916No. 7471PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by S. E. Peck against the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

In April, 1910, S. E. Peek obtained judgment in the district court of Kingfisher county, Okla., against the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company in the sum of $543, on an insurance policy issued to him by the company, whereby it insured him against loss or damage on account of the death of a certain horse, which judgment upon appeal was affirmed by this court on February 17, 1914. Pending such appeal, on January 5, 1911, the insurance company commenced this proceeding by filing in the original action a verified petition seeking the vacation of said judgment and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. El Reno Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Kkk Medicine Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Beggs Oil Co. v. DeardorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Shobe v. SykesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Shipman v. ConradSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API