Legal Opinion

Holland v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 27, 2007No. 1:06-cv-163PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order Overruling Plaintiff’s Objections, Adopting R & R, and Terminating Case

PAUL L. MALONEY, District Judge.

This matter was referred to the Honorable Joseph G. Scoville, United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) on Friday, August 3, 2007.

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) provides, “Within ten days after being served with a copy [of an R & R], any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court.” Likewise, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 provides that “[wjithin 10 days after being…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barbara Combs v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Benjamin S. GOSSETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Strong v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Meece v. Comm Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. George H. KIMBROUGH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API