Legal Opinion

Sibley v. Parsons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant Eckhardt brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The plaintiffs declared in an action of assumpsit upon two promissory notes dated June 25, 1889. These notes were for the sums of $200 and $271.11, and were to be paid in 40 and 50 days, respectively, after date. The defendant Victoria Eckhardt filed an affidavit denying the execution of the notes. She also gave notice under the general issue that she did not execute either of them; that they were given without consideration; and that she was not a member of the firm of Heck, Hemel & Eckhardt at the time the notes were made, and had not been a member of that firm since May 14, 1889. The court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graves v. MerryNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Hall v. HeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Northway Lanes v. Hackley Union National Bank And Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. Ward v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Peninsular Stove Co. v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Thompson v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Ogden Packing & Provision Co. v. WyattUtah Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API