Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 27, 1989No. 880650-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before DAVIDSON, GARFF and JACKSON, JJ. GARFF, Judge:

Defendant Rueben Ross appeals his conviction for forgery, a second degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-501 (1978). He contends that evidence of his prior conviction for attempted forgery was improperly admitted, that the prosecutor’s statement to the jury regarding the emotional condition of the State’s primary witness was prejudicial, and that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for forgery. We affirm.

On July 8, 1988, a checkbook was taken from the desk of James Quigley. On July 9,1988, defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. PetreeUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  2. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  4. Salt Lake City v. HoltmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. State v. LabrumCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API