Salt Lake City v. Holtman
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Judge:
Defendant appeals from his conviction of retail theft, a class B misdemeanor in violation of Salt Lake City Ordinance § 11.36.060. On appeal, defendant claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude evidence of his prior conviction. We agree and reverse the conviction, remanding for a new trial.
On October 28, 1989, defendant and his brother entered a Nordstrom department store in Salt Lake City, Utah. Defendant asked a salesperson if he could see several pairs of sunglasses which were displayed in a locked case. Defendant had in his possession a pair of pink and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- State v. BannerUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GentryUtah Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- State v. TeuscherCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- State v. OntiverosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.