Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Holtman

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 13, 1991No. 900177-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge:

Defendant appeals from his conviction of retail theft, a class B misdemeanor in violation of Salt Lake City Ordinance § 11.36.060. On appeal, defendant claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude evidence of his prior conviction. We agree and reverse the conviction, remanding for a new trial.

On October 28, 1989, defendant and his brother entered a Nordstrom department store in Salt Lake City, Utah. Defendant asked a salesperson if he could see several pairs of sunglasses which were displayed in a locked case. Defendant had in his possession a pair of pink and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. BannerUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. GentryUtah Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  2. State v. TeuscherCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  3. State v. OntiverosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API