Legal Opinion

Caine v. Polkinghorn

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1921No. Civ. No. 3510PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts -are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

This is an action to recover upon an alleged contract to pay. a commission to the plaintiffs as agents for the sale of real property. The defendant, against whom personally the plaintiffs seek to obtain judgment, was administratrix of the estate of W. A. Polkinghorn, deceased, to which estate the land belonged. Under date August 7, 1919, the defendant signed- an agreement authorizing the plaintiffs to sell the land for the sum of twenty thousand dollars, or any less amount thereafter authorized by her, on terms therein stated, and agreed that if the plaintiffs should sell such property, or be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bean v. Pioneer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Blanchard v. KaullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Lander v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Hay v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Estate of MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Santa Clara Properties Co. v. R. L. C., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Wilson v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API