Legal Opinion

Martines v. Worley & Sons Construction

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 2006No. A05A1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

We granted the claimant’s application for discretionary appeal in this workers’ compensation case to consider the scope of a “justified” refusal to accept a “suitable job” within the meaning of OCGA § 34-9-240. We conclude that an injured worker’s refusal to accept a suitable job based on a legal inability to perform the job resulting from the worker’s voluntary conduct, rather than a lack of skill or physical capacity, is not justified as a matter of law. We therefore affirm the judgment of the superior court.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. While working for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trent Tube v. HurstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Howard v. Scott Housing Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. City of Adel v. WiseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  4. Freeman v. Southwire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Mize v. Cleveland ExpressCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brasher v. US Xpress Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Ronald Brasher v. US Express EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Staff Management and New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Pascuala JimenezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Staff Management and New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Pascuala JimenezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API