Martin v. Martin
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Ch'eene District Court. — Hon. Z. A. Church, Judge. . Action at law to recover rent. The defendants interposed many defenses which, in view of our disposition of the case need not be further noticed. Defendants duly served notice of appeal to this court on September 20, 1901, but there is no recitation in the notice as to what the appeal is from. Ordinarily, this is not necessary, hut, as we shall see,' it has some bearing on this case.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.
1. Appealable judgement abstract. The case was tried as-in equity because of the issues tendered by the defendants in their answers and counterclaims. The only reference in the abstract to any decree is the following: “ On the 12th day of September, 1901, the court made and filed the following judgment and decree.” Then follows the *74usual form of a decree, reciting the proceedings in the case, accompanied by the results arrived at, and the final order and decree in the case, all signed “ Z. A. Church, Judge.” After this is a certificate by the attorneys as to the contents of the abstract, with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hintrager v. HennessySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Kennedy v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Babcock v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- McDermott v. Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Coffey v. GambleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bridgman v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Des Moines Savings Bank v. ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- In Re Estate of SimplotSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Sievertsen v. Paxton-Eckman Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- In Re Estate of KahlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.