Sievertsen v. Paxton-Eckman Chemical Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Carroll District Court. — Hon. Z. A. Church, Judge. * * Action of replevin for the possession of a note executed by the plaintiff. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The chemical company appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, C. J.
The judgment appealed from herein was rendered on the 3d day of May, 1909, but was not entered of record until the 6th day of May,- 1910.
1. Appeal: time of taking. The appeal was taken on June 20, 1910, and the appellee contends that this court has no jurisdiction in the matter, because the appeal was not taken within six months after the judgment was rendered. The rule is settled adversely to his contention in Stutsman v. Sharpless, 125 Iowa, 335; Puckett v. Gunther, 137 Iowa, 647. See, also, Martin v. Martin, 125 Iowa, 73.
2. Sales: reaffirmance of contract: evidence. We come now to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Stutsman v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Chamberlain v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Case v. PlatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Kennedy v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Callanan v. VotrubaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
- Des Moines Savings Bank v. ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Blakely Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Reynolds Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Katcher v. HeidenwirthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- State v. WielandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.