Legal Opinion

Ponsetti v. GE Pension Plan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 30, 2010No. 09-2430PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant benefit plans and company. Plaintiff-appellant alleged that defendants breached their fiduciary duty and their obligation to provide a “full and fair” review of a request for claims when they refused to disburse cash to a trust fund established by a former employee of General Electric. Both parties agree that by default, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., money should go to the surviving spouse of the decedent. They also…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Cynthia Larson v. United Healthcare Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. James Brooks v. Pactiv CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Donald Fessenden v. Reliance Standard Life InsuraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Eric Tapley v. Andrew ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Eileen M. Huss v. IBM Medical and DCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API