Legal Opinion

Pacific Finance Corporation v. Webster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1931No. 22741. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is a replevin action commenced in the superior court for Pierce county by the plaintiff finance corporation, seeking recovery of possession from the defendant, Webster, of a Durant coach automobile, held by him as vendee under a conditional sale contract between the Paxson-Bife Motor Company, as vendor, and Webster, as vendee, which company has assigned its rights under the contract, and conveyed its title to the automobile, to the finance corporation. Becovery by the finance corporation is sought upon the theory that Webster has, by breach of conditions of the contract, forfeited all…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Douglas v. HanburyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Whiting v. DoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gibson v. RouseWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Lundberg v. SwitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Morgan v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. Universal Credit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ryker v. StidhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Bulmon v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Pearson v. PiccoWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API