Legal Opinion

Pleyte v. Pleyte

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1890PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to District Court of Ara/pahoe Oov/rvby. On motion for leave to file a supplemental transcript.

1Opinion of the Court

Chibe Justice Helm

delivered the opinion of the court.

Subsequent to the issue of the present writ of error, defendant in error, by leave of court, filed a supplemental transcript of record. Plaintiff in error .then, for the first time, as it is alleged, became aware of the following record recital, which appears in the supplemental transcript: “ Thereupon this cause comes on for trial before the eou/rt upon defendant’s cross-complaint, neither party deswmg a jury.” She asserted the fact to be that she demanded a jury, and at no time, by word or act waived the same, but that the court denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knox v. McFerranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  2. Wolfley v. Lebanon Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  3. Pleyte v. PleyteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bessemer Irrigating Co. v. West Pueblo Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  2. Wheeler v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  3. Patrick v. WestonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Breene v. BoothColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Seeley v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API