Legal Opinion

Knox v. McFerran

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court of El Paso County.

1Per curiam

It being made to appear to this court that . certain alleged evidence had, through inadvertence, been *349improperly incorporated into the bill of exceptions, this cause was continued to give the appellee an opportunity to apply to the court -below to amend the bill of exceptions. This accords with approved practice. Wolfley et al. v. Lebanon Mining Co., 8 Col. 296; Brooks v. Bergen, 40 Ill. 65.

Appellant’s counsel was duly notified of the motion to amend and appeared in response to the notice. The amendment to the bill of exceptions, which we are asked to strike from the record, is as follows:

“Now…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wallahan v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pleyte v. PleyteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Breene v. BoothColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Seeley v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. Pleyte v. PleyteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Denver City Tramway Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API