Legal Opinion
Ambrister v. Donehew
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 5, 1938No. 27083PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from an order vacating a judgment obtained by default wherein the defendant in error was constructively summoned.
The action was commenced by J. H. Stuf-flebean, administrator of the estate of Ola K. Donehew, deceased, for the cancellation of deeds and conveyances made in her lifetime by Ola K. Donehew to her son, Marion Donehew, and certain deeds and conveyances made by said Marion Donehew to plaintiff in error, Roy Ambrister.
Marion Donehew was served with summons by publication. Defendant Ambrister filed his answer and cross-petition to quiet title in himself. Defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- McCulloch v. DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Flint v. NoyesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Wall v. SniderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Shamel v. Wichita Motors Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chemco Products, Inc. v. Moley Produce Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. RicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Richards v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Cox v. HenthornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Morton v. GilbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949