Legal Opinion

Richards v. Baker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1940No. 28755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

This is an action to vacate or reopen a default judgment rendered against the plaintiff herein, who was an incompetent.

The record reveals that in an action theretofore brought in said court wherein the question of whether a certain indebtedness represented by certain notes was a valid and subsisting obligation was directly involved, the defendant in error upon a trial of said issue on November 19, 1936, obtained a judgment against the maker of said notes and a decree foreclosing the lien of a real es-state mortgage which had been given to secure said indebtedness, and that in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Osage Investment Co. v. SigristSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  3. Clark v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Wall v. SniderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Wise v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker v. BroughtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Tate v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Vassar v. RowlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API