Legal Opinion

People v. Mullison

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 27, 1992No. 92SA25PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, a hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee recommended that the respondent be disbarred, ordered to pay restitution, and assessed the costs of the proceedings. We accept the panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on November 1, 1985, is registered as an attorney upon this court’s official records, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this court and its grievance committee in these proceedings. C.R.C.P. 241.-1(b). On October 26, 1989, we suspended the respondent from the practice of law during the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. People v. MargolinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. In re the Disciplinary Action Against JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mullison v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API