Legal Opinion

United States v. Loarn Anthony Biswell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1971No. 464-70_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice CLARK:

Appellant was indicted on six counts for violating the United States’ firearms laws, and was found guilty by a jury on the first count, i. e. dealing in firearms as defined in the Act, 26 U.S.C. § 5845, without having paid the special occupational tax required by 26 U.S.C. § 5801, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 and 5871.

He contends, inter alia, that the Act is unconstitutional because it provides for the search of non-public areas of business premises without a search warrant. Such a search without a warrant was made of appellant’s premises, and guns coming within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. Curco Drugs, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1973
  3. United States v. AnileDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1973
  4. State v. DaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. Anderson v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API