Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Reynolds

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 9, 1972No. C 63-70PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CHRISTENSEN, Senior District Judge.

This is an action for damages in reliance upon the Civil Rights Acts, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3). 1 Jurisdiction is claimed in the complaint by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1343. 2 it Wjii also be assumed that plaintiff’s action includes pendant state claims for false arrest and defamation. 3 The case was tried in August, 1971. Collateral intra-court assignment problems have intervened but these now have been resolved and the parties have submitted the issues of fact and law upon the evidence heretofore received, the oral…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guffey v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Moore v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Stanford Daily v. ZurcherDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
  4. Chesney v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
  5. Richard L. Anderson v. David W. Reynolds and W. L. (Joe) GeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API