Legal Opinion
Hatch v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 26, 1996No. PC-96-718Published
1Opinion of the Court
924 P.2d 284 (1996)
Steven Keith HATCH, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Oklahoma, Respondent.
No. PC-96-718.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.
August 6, 1996.
As Corrected November 26, 1996.
Randy A. Bauman, Deputy Division Chief, Capital Post-Conviction, Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Norman, for petitioner.
W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General of Oklahoma and Sandra D. Howard, Assistant Attorney General, Chief, Criminal Appeals, Oklahoma City, for respondent.
OPINION DENYING POST-CONVICTION RELIEF, STAY OF EXECUTION, AND REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY AND EVIDENTIARY HEARING.
LUMPKIN, Judge:
Petitioner…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Lane; Concurrence · Lane.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.