Legal Opinion

Myers v. Arthur

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1925No. 19250. Department TwoPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— This action was brought to recover a real estate brokers’ commission on the sale of furniture, fixtures, furnishings and a leasehold interest of several years in a hotel in Seattle. The employment of the brokers was not in writing. The defendant has appealed from a judgment against her.

Two questions are presented, (1) was the agreement employing the brokers within the statute of frauds; and (2) did the brokers comply with the agreement so as to entitle them to the commission 1 ? The statute relied on by the appellant is subd. 5, § 5825, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. §7745], act of 1905, which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orchard v. Wright-Dalton-Bell-Anchor Store Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Moeller v. GormleyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Tibbals v. IfflandWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. MafridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lawson v. Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Irons Investment Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Garrison General Tire Service, Inc. v. MontgomeryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lee's Ford Dock, Inc. v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API