Legal Opinion · Dissent

RICHLAND RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHC Durham Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1996No. COA94-1392Published

1Dissent

*352Judge Greene

dissenting.

I disagree with the majority that the trial court correctly dismissed the complaint on the basis that the plaintiff failed to specifically plead compliance with the applicable statute of repose. Our courts have repeatedly held that the plaintiff has the burden of proving “the condition precedent that its cause of action is brought” within the period of the applicable statute of repose. Chicopee, Inc. v. Sims Metal Works, Inc., 98 N.C. App. 423, 426, 391 S.E.2d 211, 213, disc. rev. denied to defendants and allowed to plaintiff, 327 N.C. 426, 395 S.E.2d 674 (1990), appeal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bolick v. American Barmag Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Chicopee, Inc. v. Sims Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Tipton & Young Construction Co. v. Blue Ridge Structure Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Plemmons Ex Rel. Teeter v. City of GastoniaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API