Loring v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $350 and interest upon a written instrument alleged to be a promissory note, indorsed to plaintiff, for value, before maturity. The case was tried before Baxter, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion) for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The plaintiff, as indorsee before maturity, for value,' brought this action upon a written instrument which is in these words:
$350. October 1st, 1903, after date I promise to pay to the order of the Maplebay Wind Stacker Company of Crookston, Minnesota, Two Flundred .& Fifty and "“/ioo Dollars;
*102Value received, with interest before and after maturity at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum until paid.
A discount of 6 per cent, to be allowed if paid on or before Oct. 1, 1903.
Payable at Christine State Bank, Christine, N. D.
Anton Anderson.
Sec. Twp. Range.
P. O. Comstock.
This note is given for one…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allen v. CoolingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Commercial Credit Co. v. NissenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Capital City State Bank v. SwiftDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1923
- Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. PlanckNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
- Waterhouse v. ChouinardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930