Legal Opinion

Waterhouse v. Chouinard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 14, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.

The case comes up on exceptions to a directed verdict for the plaintiff.

This was a suit on a promissory note for $400.00 given by the defendant, dated October 31, 1928, and payable to the order of C. E. Currier and by Currier, the next day, on November 1, 1928, endorsed and sold to F. H. Waterhouse, the plaintiff in this action, for the sum of $342.00.

The form of the note, together with the form of an agreement to which, at the time of the sale to the plaintiff, it was attached, was as follows:

“C. E. Currier 39 Dennison Street Auburn, Maine.

Coppus Under Grate Forced Draet Blower

Note and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merrill v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. McCoy & Spivey Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Lamb v. StoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. FeeneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. NissenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomson v. CalhounDade County Small Claims Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API