Legal Opinion

Will v. City of Herington

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1970No. 45,679PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

In this mandamus proceeding plaintiff sought restoration to public office and damages for discharge from the office. He appeals from summary judgment rendered against him.

The proceeding is a sequel to Will v. City of Herington, 201 Kan. 627, 443 P. 2d 667, involving the same parties, which must be briefly reviewed for proper perspective of the present action.

On October 21, 1966, Marvin Will, appellant herein, filed a petition in the district court of Dickinson county claiming compensation from the city of Herington on the basis he had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Krehbiel v. GoeringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Myers v. StraussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Riggs v. City of BeloitSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Will v. City of HeringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Lines v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API