Hicks v. Lucero
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Chief Justice.
The appellants, plaintiffs below, being dissatisfied with the results of an election proposing the sale of certain school bonds of Santa Rosa Consolidated School District No. 8, Guadalupe County, instituted this action against the Board of Education of District No. 8 to enjoin the issuance and sale of such bonds. The complaint alleges (a) that a majority of the legal electors voting on the question of the issuance of such bonds voted against the proposition, and (b) that three persons voting on the question were not qualified electors of the district. From a judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennington v. HareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Perkins v. BertrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Farnham v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Lynip v. BucknerNevada Supreme Court · 1895
- Bryan v. BarnettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Romenesko v. BarberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968