Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Bike & Build, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.
*403In this declaratory judgment action, Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Bike & Build, Inc., to which Nautilus issued a commercial general liability policy, in connection with a lawsuit filed against Bike & Build by Bridget Anderson. Defendant/Crossclaimant United Specialty Insurance Company, Bike & Build's excess insurer, seeks similar relief. Bike & Build seeks the opposite: a declaration that both insurers are required to defend and indemnify it in the underlying lawsuit and to provide coverage for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Cherie Hugh v. Butler County Family YmcaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chris Eldredge Containers v. Crum & Forster Spec.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
- GRAMAGLIA-PARENT v. TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INS. CO.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- HAMMER v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- HOWLAND v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- HUMANS & RESOURCES, LLC v. HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.