Legal Opinion

Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Bike & Build, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION No. 16-4839PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.

*403In this declaratory judgment action, Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Bike & Build, Inc., to which Nautilus issued a commercial general liability policy, in connection with a lawsuit filed against Bike & Build by Bridget Anderson. Defendant/Crossclaimant United Specialty Insurance Company, Bike & Build's excess insurer, seeks similar relief. Bike & Build seeks the opposite: a declaration that both insurers are required to defend and indemnify it in the underlying lawsuit and to provide coverage for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. Cherie Hugh v. Butler County Family YmcaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chris Eldredge Containers v. Crum & Forster Spec.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. GRAMAGLIA-PARENT v. TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INS. CO.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. HAMMER v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. HOWLAND v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. HUMANS & RESOURCES, LLC v. HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API