Bass v. . Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaRnhill, J.
The portions of the answer which plaintiffs seek to have stricken are not so irrelevant and immaterial as to require a reversal of the judgment below. Such questions as plaintiffs seek to present by their motion may be decided by objections to the evidence offered in support thereof at the trial. We enter into no detailed discussion thereof for the further reason that, even if stricken and not considered, plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment on the pleadings.
In the action to vacate the Lamm-Dickinson deeds, the court acquired jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Fowler v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. E. Uptegraff Manufacturing Co. v. International Union of Electrical Radio & Machine WorkersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Beck v. VoncannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Patrick v. PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Linkous v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998