Beck v. Voncannon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohNsoN, J.
The challenged summons was issued by Yera Maie Uzzell, Deputy Clerk, in her own name, instead of in the name of her principal. The crucial question thus presented is: Does this want of proper signature amount to a failure to comply witb tbe requirements of due process so as to make the summons ineffectual to confer jurisdiction and render the whole proceeding void and of no effect, or is the omission a mere nonjurisdictional irregularity, subject to amendment?
Clerks of the Superior Court are authorized by statute to appoint deputies. Chap. 115, Sec. 86, Laws of 1777, now codified in amended…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jarman v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Henderson v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Craddock v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Miller v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Redmond v. . MullenaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Everhart v. SowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- In Re Department of Archives & History for Certificate of Public Convenience & Necessity for Restoration of Tryon's PalaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Brenkworth v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Walker v. StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Greene v. HoekstraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.