Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Moore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1972No. 42060Published

1DissentHale, J.

(dissenting) — I think it basic to the idea of due process of law that one compelled to defend himself in court not only be apprised of the nature of the claim and the facts upon which it depends but who is suing him. A person dragooned into court to wage his defense is entitled to know who are the real parties in interest against him, who it is that is putting him to the travail and costs of defending himself, and who will benefit by the judgment or decree. In a true class action, one’s adversaries are readily identifiable, and there is no mystery as to how the judgment or decree will…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Puget Sound Alumni of Kappa Sigma, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API