Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1917No. 13549PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered April 12, 1915, upon a trial and conviction of rape.

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb, J. —

Appellant was informed against and convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge of a female child under the age of ten years. On this appeal he maintains that the eight-year-old prosecuting witness was not competent to testify because of her tender years, and that the admission of her testimony was error.

Rem. Code, § 1213, provides:

“The following persons shall not be competent to testify:—
“(1) Those who are of unsound mind, or intoxicated at the time of their production for examination; and
“(2) Children under ten years of age who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. SwistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Freidrich v. Territory of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State v. MyrbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LouieWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. WhitfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. CollierWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API