Legal Opinion
Marudas v. Odegard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 11, 1943No. 33,416PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court overruling a demurrer to the complaint in a libel suit.
The complaint alleges that both plaintiff and defendant are automobile dealers in the village of Milaca and that defendant caused to be printed in a local newspaper an article the material portion of which is as follows:
“To all Owners op General Motors Cars in our Territory
“The service department of the Chevrolet Garage being closed and the Pontiac shop soon to follow, we have made arrangements with General Motors to be supplied with genuine G. M. parts that we may…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morasse v. BrochuMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Kee v. Armstrong, Byrd & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- McDermott v. Union Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Landon v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Svendsen v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Utecht v. Shopko Department StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Price v. Viking Press, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Management Registry, Inc. v. A.W. Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Utecht v. Shopko Department StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982