Bishop v. T. Ryan Construction Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered April 10, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on . contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On June 26, 1916, the Cascade Construction Company entered into a contract with the county of Snohomish, by the terms of which it undertook to reconstruct and hard-surface a county road, extending from the city of Stanwood, in such county, westerly to the county line, a distance of nine-tenths of a mile; the improvement being known and referred to under the contract as Project No. 16, of Snohomish county. On entering into the contract, the contractor gave a bond to the county, with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as surety, conditioned for the faithful performance of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- City of Port Townsend v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Hurley-Mason Co. v. American Bonding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by18 opinions
- Neary v. Puget Sound Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LincolnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Wiggins v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Better Financial Solutions, Inc. v. Caicos Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Home Reader Service, Inc. v. GrappiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.