Animal Legal Defense Fund v. California Exposition & State Fairs
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
Plaintiffs brought a Code of Civil Procedure section 526a (section 526a) taxpayer action against defendants based on allegations that defendants commit animal cruelty every summer by transporting pregnant pigs and housing them in farrowing crates at the state fair. One defendant, joined by the other, demurred, contending plaintiffs’ complaint failed to state a cause of action for three distinct reasons, including that California’s animal cruelty laws are not enforceable through a taxpayer action. The trial court agreed on all accounts, and sustained the demurrer without…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Ceres v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. MendesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Humane Society of the United States v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leider v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Cal. Dui Lawyers Ass'n v. Cal. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- CA DUI Lawyers Assn v. CA DMVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Collins v. ThurmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Collins v. ThurmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.