People v. Gompertz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J.—
Defendants Laurence K. Gompertz and Leonard Brophy were convicted of the crime denounced by section 337a, subdivision 2, Penal Code. No judgment was pronounced nor sentence imposed. They were granted conditional probation and now appeal from the order denying a new trial. Defendants’ main contention is that the evidence produced was insufficient to establish that they occupied the place with books, papers, or paraphernalia for the purpose of recording or registering bets upon the results of horse races.
The arresting officers testified generally that they went to a store building…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. GreenwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Elsie B. Allen, George D. Allen v. Matson Navigation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- People v. ShoalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.