Legal Opinion

People v. Gompertz

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1951No. Crim. 748PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, J.—

Defendants Laurence K. Gompertz and Leonard Brophy were convicted of the crime denounced by section 337a, subdivision 2, Penal Code. No judgment was pronounced nor sentence imposed. They were granted conditional probation and now appeal from the order denying a new trial. Defendants’ main contention is that the evidence produced was insufficient to establish that they occupied the place with books, papers, or paraphernalia for the purpose of recording or registering bets upon the results of horse races.

The arresting officers testified generally that they went to a store building…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. GreenwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Elsie B. Allen, George D. Allen v. Matson Navigation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. People v. ShoalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API