Legal Opinion
United States v. Mizrahie
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 19, 1985No. Court 83-8-01189PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RE, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case is whether a surety seeking indemnification on an import bond, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1583 (1982), may obtain a writ of attachment against an indemnitor’s real property located in California. This Court holds that it is empowered to issue a writ of attachment affecting property located in California, and that the requirements of California law, for the issuance of the writ, have been met.
On March 6, 1985, defendant-third-party plaintiff, Safeco Insurance Company of America (Safeco), sought an ex parte right to attach…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Ownbey v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Fidelity Insurance v. Sweet Little Mexico Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- American Motorists Insurance Company v. United Furnace Co., Inc., F/k/a "United Foundry,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. B.B.S. Electronics International Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1985
- United States v. Daewoo International (America) Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Home Prods. Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019