People v. Hammond
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Ingham; Wiest, J. D. Judson Hammond was convicted of soliciting a bribe.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The respondent was convicted under an indictment which, after reciting that he was duly elected and qualified as a member of the legislature, and that a certain measure was pending before the legislature, charges the offense as follows:
‘ While said bill was still pending in an d before said house of representatives as aforesaid, and on, to wit, the 23d day of May, A. D. 1899, at, to wit, the county and State aforesaid, the said D. Judson Hammond, so being such legislative officer, sitting and acting as such, well knowing the premises, and that he would be called upon in his official capacity…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDade v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Commonwealth v. FlaggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Walsh v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. HowesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Smith v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. BowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- People v. ProvostMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. SchneiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- House Grain Co. v. Finerman & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.