Legal Opinion

Walsh v. People

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1872PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Weit of Eeeoe to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. William W. Fabwell, Judge, presiding. Mr. John YanAbman, and Mr. Emeby A. Stobes, for the plaintiff in error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thoenton

The defendant below was an alderman of the common conncil of the city of Chicago. As such, he was indicted for a1 proposal, made by himself, to receive a bribe, to influence his , action in the discharge of his duties.

The indictment is, in form, an indictment at common law; and it is conceded that the statute has not created such an offense against an alderman. Our criminal code has made it an offense to propose, or agree to receive, a bribe, on the part of certain officers; but an alderman is not, either in terms or by construction, included amongst them. Rev. Stat. 1845, p„ 167, sec. 87.

It…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. McCannIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API