Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Termain

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 20, 2004No. 52967-6-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Grosse, J.

—A charging document alleging a violation of a domestic violence order must identify the order the *800defendant is alleged to have violated, or at least include sufficient facts to apprise the defendant of his or her actions giving rise to the charge(s). Here, the challenged complaint merely tracks the language of the ordinance, other than setting forth dates of the charging period. The complaint does not identify the specific order alleged to have been violated or the court granting the order. Further, it fails to contain any other factual basis for the charges. The decision of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Bothell v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. City of Bothell v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State Of Washington v. Andrea Lynn ListerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State Of Washington v. B. J. N.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State Of Washington v. Eric Charles MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API