Legal Opinion

DILLA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1984No. ID 2962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2962 MATTER OF DILLA In Deportation Proceedings A-21290714 Decided by Board April 17, 1984 The Supreme Court of the United States has recently held that the 7 years' con- tinuous physical presence requirement of section 244(aX1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(1) (1982), was meant by Congress to be adminis- tered as written; accordingly, in an application for suspension of deportation, an alien must establish, inter alia, that he has been physically present in the United States without interruption for a period of 7 years before he is statutorily…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Percy Briggs Wadman v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. CHOULIARISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
  5. Sombat Kamheangpatiyooth v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MENDOZA-SANDINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2000
  2. TORRESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1986
  3. O-J-OBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API