Legal Opinion

Beverly v. Siegel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1932No. 3814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

This action was filed by Joe W. Siegel and his wife, Ruth A. Siegel, to recover damages on account of personal injuries to Mrs. Siegel resulting from a collision of their automobile with one driven by Mrs. Florence Beverly.

The car which Mrs. Beverly was driving was owned by Coe & Parks Lumber Company, but no judgment was awarded against the company. The American Indemnity Company was made defendant by allegations to the effect that it had issued a policy to Coe & Parks Lumber Company, the owner of the car which was being operated by Mrs. Beverly, and that under the terms of said policy said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. American Automobile Ins. Co. v. StruweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. HelmTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Monzingo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. T. C. R'y Co. v. BurnettTexas Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roeser v. CofferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Paul v. DuttonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Roberts v. Dallas Railway & Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Redfern v. CollinsDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1953
  5. Thomas v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API