Legal Opinion

Falkner v. Foshaug

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 27, 2001No. 45326-2-IPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

29 P.3d 771 (2001)

Robert FALKNER, Appellant,

v.

Michael FOSHAUG and Jane Doe Foshaug, husband and wife; Foshaug, McGoran, Sawyer & Aronoff, a Professional Services Corporation, Respondents.

No. 45326-2-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

August 27, 2001.

Sean Wickens, Law Offices of Sverre O. Staurset PS; Stephen J. Oelrich, Tacoma, for Appellant.

Michael B. King, James B. Stoetzer, Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, Seattle, for Respondents.

AGID, C.J.

This case presents an issue of first impression: Whether a defendant whose counsel rendered ineffective assistance in a criminal proceeding may,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In the Matter of Thomas v. Cassidy, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Robert Allen Barker v. Donald H. Capotosto and Thomas M. MageeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API