Legal Opinion
Prillaman v. Century Indemnity Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided February 12, 1943No. Civil Action 58PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, District Judge.
This action having been tried upon the facts by the Court without a jury, the Court doth hereby find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon, and directs the entry of the appropriate judgment, as follows, in conformity with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c:
Findings of Fact.
In May, 1941, one W. O. Emerson was in the employment of Palmer Produce Company in the City of Danville, and had title to a partly-paid-for automobile which he occasionally used in transacting the business of his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Utley v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Moore v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Maxey v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Teal v. BilbySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Freeman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1979