Morrison v. Regan
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Court, Owyhee County. It is only where the insufficiency of the location certificate in its failure to mention natural objects or permanent landmarks is apparent upon its face that the court may reject it. (Dillon v. Bayliss, 11 Mont. 171, 27 Pac. 725; Darger v. Le Sieur, 8 Utah, 160, 30 Pac. 363; Hammer v. Garfield M. & M. Go., 130 U. S. 291, 9 Sup. Ct. Bep. 548, 32 L. ed., 964; Bus-sell v. Chumasero, 4 Mont. 309, 1 Pac. 713; Clearwater Short Line By.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from District Court, Owyhee County. It is only where the insufficiency of the location certificate in its failure to mention natural objects or permanent landmarks is apparent upon its face that the court may reject it. (Dillon v. Bayliss, 11 Mont. 171, 27 Pac. 725; Darger v. Le Sieur, 8 Utah, 160, 30 Pac. 363; Hammer v. Garfield M. & M. Go., 130 U. S. 291, 9 Sup. Ct. Bep. 548, 32 L. ed., 964; Bus-sell v. Chumasero, 4 Mont. 309, 1 Pac. 713; Clearwater Short Line By. Co. v. San Guarde, 7 Idaho, 106, 61 Pac. 137; Farmington Gold Min. Co. v. Bhymney Gold etc. Co., 20 Utah, 363, 77 Am. St.…
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
— This is an action in support of an adverse claim made by the plaintiff against the application for a patent made by the defendant to the Summit lode mining claim, situated in French mining district, Owyhee county. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that the plaintiffs were the owners of a certain lode mining claim known as the Bullion; that said claim was located on the first day of January, 1887, by James Shaw and Simon Morrison; that on the nineteenth day of September, 1900, the plaintiffs by their agent made an amended location of said Bullion claim; that the plaintiffs and their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Strepey v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- McEvoy v. HymanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1885
- Farmington Gold Mining Co. v. Rhymney Gold & Copper Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- Flavin v. MattinglyMontana Supreme Court · 1888
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Humphreys v. Idaho Gold Mines Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Flynn Group Mining Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Kinney v. LundyArizona Supreme Court · 1907
- Hagerman v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.