Legal Opinion

Humphries v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 2002No. A02A0333PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Willie Humphries appeals from his convictions for rape and aggravated sodomy. On appeal he contends, among other things, that the trial court erred by allowing him to proceed to trial pro se without first establishing that he made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of his right to counsel. Since the record does not establish that Humphries was given sufficient information to make a knowing and intelligent waiver, we reverse.

The record reveals that Humphries was originally represented by the Fulton County Public Defender’s Office. Although his four prior attorneys from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Clarke v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Prater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Middleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. McAdams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Bradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API